Here's a shout-out to all of you badminton fanatics out there! 2012 has been a nice year with lots of new rackets and reviews.
I look forward to reviewing more in 2013. Comments are always welcome so let me know if there's anything you'd like to see on these pages.
To end off this great year, I'd like to share some interesting facts about this blog. Thanks all for reading, and here's to a better 2013!
Most Read Post
Badminton Racket Review: Yonex Voltric Z-Force Review
Most Searched for Rackets
1. Yonex Voltric Z-Force
2. Carlton Kinesis
3. Yonex Voltric 80
4. Yonex Voltric 60
5. Yonex Nanoray 800
Most Readers from a Single Country
1. Malaysia
2. Singapore
3. United States
Badminton Racket Review: Victor Spira 22
First Impressions here.
I'll be honest. I've sold every single Victor racket I've come to own so far. Somehow they all seem to fade away after the first few uses. What seemed to be a good racket seems to get its ability sapped away by time and more frequent use.
I fully believe in the term "familiarity breeds contempt", and it seems really apt in the case of my experience with the Victor brand.
Unfortunately, this is also the case for the Spira 22. I wrote a resoundingly good First Impression of the racket, all in the hope of this being the one good one that slipped through the Victor curse.
Not that it's a bad racket, mind you. The Spira 22 has it's qualities, it just seems to become less and less useful the more games I play with it.
Note. This review is my opinion of the racket from using it in my games. Take this with a pinch of salt since we all play the game differently. I'm here to tell you, in as much accuracy as I can, how my games went with the racket. Comments welcome!
Ok here goes.
Victor Spira 22
Est. Dry Weight: 97g (3U)
Grip Size: G2 (Yonex G5)
Balance: 4/5 (Victor's rating system)
Stiffness: 3/5 (Victor's rating system)
Strings: Pro-Kennex Pro Flex 85 @ 27lbs
I recommend this racket for singles play.
Defense
The defense for the Victor Spira 22 isn't very memorable. I don't recall having a lot of difficulty fending off attacks, nor can I truly say that the racket offers me the ease of placement on defense like the lighter Karakals.
Being on the head heavy side, I seemed to be able to block smashes and drives better than lift them. The slightly flexible shaft also lends to the difficulty in lifting after a smash. Having such limitations narrow the game play and won't allow me to move the opponent around as much as I want to.
However, I do notice that the Spira 22 delivers a very decent drive defense. If the smashes come too flat, it's all too easy to have the racket twist it's head and send the shuttle zipping down the opposite
Attack
Brutal. The Spira 22 has a fast swing speed. Coupled with the high tension-high repulsion qualities of the Pro Kennex strings, the attacks from the racket is one to be looked out for.
At the front of the court however, the Victor Spira 22 becomes a liability. Somehow I can't seem to lift the racket head fast enough to intercept shuttles. The racket soon becomes one that is more suited to play the back court, sending clears and smashes down the enemy line.
Control
Shot-making with the racket is easy. The head is stable enough to give right direction to most of my shots. However I did notice that I get more mis-hits with this racket than most. I usually stop making frame hits after I get warmed up to the shuttles, but that problem continues to bug me with the Spira 22.
Being less head heavy than my usual singles rackets, the Spira 22 also didn't allow me to clear as accurately. Having to use more strength from the back contributes to the larger amount of unforced errors to the sides.
This fact contradicts the point I made earlier about the racket being a back court racket. Not being able to move the shuttle across the back lines is a bad trait to have for something more suited to a rear attack style of play.
Unlike the long clears, drop shots and net play didn't seem to disappoint. The Victor Spira 22 is heavy enough to shift weight to the shuttle on the tight net shots, and also makes the drop shots a little more efficient since the natural weight of the head on the down swing will take care of the flight towards the opponent's front court.
Looks
I've been having a blue racket craze of late, and the Spira 22 adds to the collection with its electric blue exterior lined with streaks of black and silver.
Add the very matching Pro Kennex strings to that and you've got a very cool-looking racket.
I'll be honest. I've sold every single Victor racket I've come to own so far. Somehow they all seem to fade away after the first few uses. What seemed to be a good racket seems to get its ability sapped away by time and more frequent use.
I fully believe in the term "familiarity breeds contempt", and it seems really apt in the case of my experience with the Victor brand.
Unfortunately, this is also the case for the Spira 22. I wrote a resoundingly good First Impression of the racket, all in the hope of this being the one good one that slipped through the Victor curse.
Not that it's a bad racket, mind you. The Spira 22 has it's qualities, it just seems to become less and less useful the more games I play with it.
Note. This review is my opinion of the racket from using it in my games. Take this with a pinch of salt since we all play the game differently. I'm here to tell you, in as much accuracy as I can, how my games went with the racket. Comments welcome!
Ok here goes.
Victor Spira 22
Est. Dry Weight: 97g (3U)
Grip Size: G2 (Yonex G5)
Balance: 4/5 (Victor's rating system)
Stiffness: 3/5 (Victor's rating system)
Strings: Pro-Kennex Pro Flex 85 @ 27lbs
I recommend this racket for singles play.
Defense
The defense for the Victor Spira 22 isn't very memorable. I don't recall having a lot of difficulty fending off attacks, nor can I truly say that the racket offers me the ease of placement on defense like the lighter Karakals.
Being on the head heavy side, I seemed to be able to block smashes and drives better than lift them. The slightly flexible shaft also lends to the difficulty in lifting after a smash. Having such limitations narrow the game play and won't allow me to move the opponent around as much as I want to.
However, I do notice that the Spira 22 delivers a very decent drive defense. If the smashes come too flat, it's all too easy to have the racket twist it's head and send the shuttle zipping down the opposite
Attack
Brutal. The Spira 22 has a fast swing speed. Coupled with the high tension-high repulsion qualities of the Pro Kennex strings, the attacks from the racket is one to be looked out for.
At the front of the court however, the Victor Spira 22 becomes a liability. Somehow I can't seem to lift the racket head fast enough to intercept shuttles. The racket soon becomes one that is more suited to play the back court, sending clears and smashes down the enemy line.
Control
Shot-making with the racket is easy. The head is stable enough to give right direction to most of my shots. However I did notice that I get more mis-hits with this racket than most. I usually stop making frame hits after I get warmed up to the shuttles, but that problem continues to bug me with the Spira 22.
Being less head heavy than my usual singles rackets, the Spira 22 also didn't allow me to clear as accurately. Having to use more strength from the back contributes to the larger amount of unforced errors to the sides.
This fact contradicts the point I made earlier about the racket being a back court racket. Not being able to move the shuttle across the back lines is a bad trait to have for something more suited to a rear attack style of play.
Unlike the long clears, drop shots and net play didn't seem to disappoint. The Victor Spira 22 is heavy enough to shift weight to the shuttle on the tight net shots, and also makes the drop shots a little more efficient since the natural weight of the head on the down swing will take care of the flight towards the opponent's front court.
Looks
I've been having a blue racket craze of late, and the Spira 22 adds to the collection with its electric blue exterior lined with streaks of black and silver.
Add the very matching Pro Kennex strings to that and you've got a very cool-looking racket.
Victor Spira 22
Defense: 7
Attack: 9
Control: 7
Looks: 8
Badminton Shoe Review: Babolat Shadow
This is my first badminton shoe review, and it's going to be quite different from the rackets one since there's probably a whole different set of specs to rate.
I've got four pairs of shoes at the moment - Mizunos Wave Lightning 8 and Wave Fang XT, a Li Ning AZYG013-2 (they should probably have cooler names for their shoes), and I'm going to try and rate them somehow...
I also used to own a pair of Yonex SHB101-LTD, but that's been retired and too far from memory to be fair in reviewing.
So without further adieu, here is the review.
Note: This review is my opinion of the shoe from using it in my games. Take this with a pinch of salt since we all play the game differently. I'm here to tell you, in as much accuracy as I can, how the shoe feels and if it added to the game. Comments welcome!
Comfort
This comes in a close second after looks (go figure). You should really learn to get the right sized shoes for your feet; I remember someone telling me once that he can wear anything from size 9-10...
Which is really troubling since a half size difference in my shoe size caused my feet to hurt during the game and for me to almost sprain my ankle.
The Babolat Shadow has a really thin cast, wrapping around your feet like a blanket in the cold night. There are elastic wraps inside the shoe to really grab onto the top of your foot, making the fit exceptionally fine.
When pulled, the laces don't really feel tight, but rather a little loose even though I've tightened them as much as I can. This is pretty much a good thing since you've got the stability of a well-strung piece of footwear, as well as the comfort of a loose sneaker on your feet.
Stability / Grip
I usually test the shoe's gripping ability by placing the shoe on the court and then attempting to slide it across the floor with a finger. If that turns out well, I'll use my foot.
Generally, I've noticed that the flat-soled shoes tend to do better in this department, but the Babolat Shadow is no sore contender. It manages to hold on tight enough so that I don't end up falling over from stepping on a bead of sweat.
The patterns on the bottom of the shoe are excessive enough to enable good lateral movement and stopping power. It's like the sole of your old SHB92 if you've ever seen them. I like soles like those.
Not your one-piece construction, but it sure as heck can give you a solid turn when you need it, with different patterns at different locations of the sole to optimize your stopping.
 |
| Image from Babolat website |
On the court
The Babolat Shadow makes me feel faster. Not only because it's darn light, but also because of the closer fit on the feet that makes it feel less burdened.
I've thicker shoes like the Li Ning one that gives you a very high stability but at the cost of additional weight. Both shoes move fine on the court, but you've got to give it to the Babolat Shadow for making movement so much more fun.
Because it's not fully flat on the ground like the Li Ning and the Wave Fang, the shoes offer a quicker change in direction due less drag on your movement. Overall chasing shuttles with this shoe is a little easier.
However, the light weight and thin foot-wrapping comfort comes at a cost. The need for thick-toe socks appears when you're moving around in singles games for two hours like I do. From all the stopping and turning, I was pretty much left with a sore foot... The lack of cushioning for the tip of the shoe raises some issues on its durability.
Babolat Shadow
Pros:
Very Light
Comfortable and not warm after wearing
Good stop and turn
Excellent pace
Cons:
Lack of cushioning makes toe hurt
Durability issues from thin material used
Badminton Strings Review: Pro-Kennex Rainbow Pro, Pro Flex 85, and Pro Flex 80 Ti
I had the chance to try out these awesome strings from Pro-Kennex, and I have to say they've been pretty good for my games so far.
One thing that I've noticed is that my smash speed and force increased. The three strings have very a very good hold, in that they take in the shuttle and stretch the string bed before repulsing the shuttle.
If you, like me, are one of those who like to feel the shuttle being absorbed into the strings before the hit, you'll surely like the three Pro-Kennex strings.
I'll start with two I've found less liking to (no less good to play with) before I move on to the one I like best.
The Rainbow Pro strings are your staples. 0.66mm with really response and feel. I've been told they fray quite easily though. After a few sessions I could notice the strings in the off-centre zone fray. True to its name, it comes in duo-tone and a rainbow option for those who opt for a little color in their game.
The Pro Flex 80 Ti feels exactly like the Rainbow, but it comes in at 0.68mm. This potentially gives you more power on your hits since more of the string is there to hold and repel the shuttle. Since I normally play with thicker strings (Yonex Nanogy 99), this felt more at ease than the Rainbow Pro.
Until this came along.
I like the Nanogy 99 because of the bite it offers to the shuttle. You feel like you can throw the shuttle off in any direction because the grooves on the strings catch onto the shuttle for that little much more.
The Pro-Kennex Pro Flex 85 offers the same sensation, but at a better feel than the typically harder Yonex Nanogy 99. The Pro Flex 85 gives me more control since I don't have to use much energy to place shots because of the strong holding capabilities of the string.
Coming in at 0.68mm as well, this string is the perfect replacement for my Yonex, not only because it's cheaper but more importantly because it adds more to my game.
Being good at holding the shuttle means I can string at higher tensions. I've moved my regular tension up to 27lbs, and that has given me stronger smashes alongside with the easier clears.
All-in-all, the Pro-Kennex series of strings offer me a greater feel, but at the cost of shorter string life. I don't expect them to last as long as the Yonex ones do, but it sure as heck gives me a more fun game.
One thing that I've noticed is that my smash speed and force increased. The three strings have very a very good hold, in that they take in the shuttle and stretch the string bed before repulsing the shuttle.
If you, like me, are one of those who like to feel the shuttle being absorbed into the strings before the hit, you'll surely like the three Pro-Kennex strings.
I'll start with two I've found less liking to (no less good to play with) before I move on to the one I like best.
The Rainbow Pro strings are your staples. 0.66mm with really response and feel. I've been told they fray quite easily though. After a few sessions I could notice the strings in the off-centre zone fray. True to its name, it comes in duo-tone and a rainbow option for those who opt for a little color in their game.
The Pro Flex 80 Ti feels exactly like the Rainbow, but it comes in at 0.68mm. This potentially gives you more power on your hits since more of the string is there to hold and repel the shuttle. Since I normally play with thicker strings (Yonex Nanogy 99), this felt more at ease than the Rainbow Pro.
Until this came along.
I like the Nanogy 99 because of the bite it offers to the shuttle. You feel like you can throw the shuttle off in any direction because the grooves on the strings catch onto the shuttle for that little much more.
The Pro-Kennex Pro Flex 85 offers the same sensation, but at a better feel than the typically harder Yonex Nanogy 99. The Pro Flex 85 gives me more control since I don't have to use much energy to place shots because of the strong holding capabilities of the string.
Coming in at 0.68mm as well, this string is the perfect replacement for my Yonex, not only because it's cheaper but more importantly because it adds more to my game.
Being good at holding the shuttle means I can string at higher tensions. I've moved my regular tension up to 27lbs, and that has given me stronger smashes alongside with the easier clears.
All-in-all, the Pro-Kennex series of strings offer me a greater feel, but at the cost of shorter string life. I don't expect them to last as long as the Yonex ones do, but it sure as heck gives me a more fun game.
Badminton Racket First Impressions: Yonex Armortec 900 Technique
I finally took the racket out for a swing today at a session of doubles, and it felt gooooood!
Speed-wise it's almost up there with the lighter rackets. I was able to defend pretty well despite the head-heavy orientation. Sealing the front court with this was also quite an experience. I was able to move quick enough to attend to the net shots and drives that came my way.
However, I was really amazed by the speed this racket gets on its smashes! It came naturally, punching the shuttle hard towards the floor of the opposite side.
So far so good. Review to come!
Speed-wise it's almost up there with the lighter rackets. I was able to defend pretty well despite the head-heavy orientation. Sealing the front court with this was also quite an experience. I was able to move quick enough to attend to the net shots and drives that came my way.
However, I was really amazed by the speed this racket gets on its smashes! It came naturally, punching the shuttle hard towards the floor of the opposite side.
So far so good. Review to come!
Badminton Shoes: Babolat Shadow
I saw this pair of shoes awhile back, and they kinda stuck with me because they just look so good...
Anyway, fast forward a few months, and they're finally on sale so I got me a pair.
Have yet to try it out to see how they compare to the Mizunos and Li Ning that I have.
But they're darn light! And they go with the new Spira 22 that made my game so well.
Review to come.
Anyway, fast forward a few months, and they're finally on sale so I got me a pair.
Have yet to try it out to see how they compare to the Mizunos and Li Ning that I have.
But they're darn light! And they go with the new Spira 22 that made my game so well.
Review to come.
Badminton Racket First Impressions: Victor Spira 22
I had an enjoyable singles session today, and it was partly in thanks to this "blue lightning".
Well, I wouldn't call it very fast, but it was reliable enough to deal enough damage to the other side of the court. I've never been a fan of the Victor series of rackets (I've sold every single one I've ever owned so far), but the Spira 22 might actually stick around for a bit.
This variation of the Spira series of rackets comes with an even balance and more flex than it's previous counterpart, the 21. I used the Victor Spira 21 for a bit before deciding that I wasn't strong enough to use something that stiff.
Another contributing factor to my game today has got to be the Pro-Kennex strings that I've recently had the chance to try out. I've tried my third so far, and I must say that the hold on these strings are amazing. It's like some kungfu stuff where they take in the shuttle and then absorb the force before throwing it all out towards the other side of the court.
Very enjoyable smashing, very easy clearing, even easier dropping.
All-in-all, the Spira 22 and the Pro-Kennex strings add up to a very reliable racket that's able to perform noticeably well in my singles game. I'll try to get some doubles action as well, but for now the blue racket with blue strings make a very good impression.
Reviews soon.
Well, I wouldn't call it very fast, but it was reliable enough to deal enough damage to the other side of the court. I've never been a fan of the Victor series of rackets (I've sold every single one I've ever owned so far), but the Spira 22 might actually stick around for a bit.
This variation of the Spira series of rackets comes with an even balance and more flex than it's previous counterpart, the 21. I used the Victor Spira 21 for a bit before deciding that I wasn't strong enough to use something that stiff.
Another contributing factor to my game today has got to be the Pro-Kennex strings that I've recently had the chance to try out. I've tried my third so far, and I must say that the hold on these strings are amazing. It's like some kungfu stuff where they take in the shuttle and then absorb the force before throwing it all out towards the other side of the court.
Very enjoyable smashing, very easy clearing, even easier dropping.
All-in-all, the Spira 22 and the Pro-Kennex strings add up to a very reliable racket that's able to perform noticeably well in my singles game. I'll try to get some doubles action as well, but for now the blue racket with blue strings make a very good impression.
Reviews soon.
Badminton Racket Review: Pro-Kennex Nano X2 9000
First Impressions here.
This brand brings back memories. It's the first brand of rackets I've ever owned, and it's been with me through my little boy school team days.
The stringer brought in a few models and only this one caught my eye. It's green, so that's quite a surprise. The Pro-Kennex Nano X2 9000 is the top tier of the range available at the stringer, and at first handling you can see why.
The spiral graphite adds to the stiffness of the racket, and it gives off a rather good feel when you hit it, especially when you're playing doubles and like to stand at the net like I do.
However, preliminary playing with the X2 9000 wasn't as satisfactory since the light weight of the racket makes it difficult to clear with.
I've taken more swings with the racket, enough to write a review.
Note. This review is my opinion of the racket from using it in my games. Take this with a pinch of salt since we all play the game differently. I'm here to tell you, in as much accuracy as I can, how my games went with the racket. Comments welcome!
Ok here goes.
Pro-Kennex Nano X2 9000
Est. Dry Weight: 94g (4u)
Grip Size: G5
Balance: Head Heavy
Flex: Stiff
Strings: Yonex BG66 Ultimax @ 25lbs
Before I start, I'd like to add that I've added about 2-3g of lead tape to the 2 and 10 o'clock of the racket.
I recommend this racket for doubles play.
Defense
I wrote in the First Impressions that the racket was fast in defense because of the 4U weight. However that was also the reason why it couldn't clear far. I hated not being able to clear far, so I added the lead tape to give it a little push at the back of the court.
However, this extra weight at the top of the racket was all it too to slow down the defensive swings considerably. The Pro-Kennex Nano X2 900 potentially can shug off attacks and have your oppoennts scrambling around trying to chase their own smashes, but for the duration of my matches with the lead-taped head, it's just at little bit slower, and I couldn't generate enough swing to punch it very far either.
Taking into account the slower speed to raise the racket above my head, the drive defenses also took a beating. Not that it wasn't fast, but I do remember the X2 9000 being a whole lot faster.
Attack
If the defense goes down because of the weight of the head, the attack will of course be directly be affected by it. The Pro-Kennex X2 9000 is able to delivery quality smashes down your enemy line.
Although equipped with power wedges at the 2 and 10 o'clock positions, the lead weight did much to help those two along the way. Think of the power wedge as the same as Yonex Voltric's Tri-Voltage weight system.
But the Pro-Kennex Nano X2 9000 really shines when it's at the front of the net, intercepting and getting them check and wrist smashes in. A simple turn of the wrist and the shuttle's on the floor before you know it.
Drive attacks seem to have taken a back seat though, which is a very strange thing for a light weight racket to have. I wasn't able to generate as much threat from my drives. I'd rather smash and drop with this
Control
Speaking of drops, the stiffness of the spiral graphite used to make the shaft adds plenty to control at the front court, if only the lousy shaped racket head didn't get in the way all the time.
Somehow I wasn't able to get as much agility and accuracy from this racket as I would let. the pushes were off to the side, the clears a little too far and the clears just aren't hitting the right spot.
That said, it was rather difficult to get into the game when half the time you're cursing the shuttle for hitting your frame so much. This applies to both the smashes, clears and especially net drops.
Looks
Green and black makes a pretty good combination, with the black spiral shaft coiling its way up the sculpture and melting the gloss covering to a matt finishing on the racket. Pro-Kennex showed a nice sense of design with this one.
This brand brings back memories. It's the first brand of rackets I've ever owned, and it's been with me through my little boy school team days.
The stringer brought in a few models and only this one caught my eye. It's green, so that's quite a surprise. The Pro-Kennex Nano X2 9000 is the top tier of the range available at the stringer, and at first handling you can see why.
The spiral graphite adds to the stiffness of the racket, and it gives off a rather good feel when you hit it, especially when you're playing doubles and like to stand at the net like I do.
However, preliminary playing with the X2 9000 wasn't as satisfactory since the light weight of the racket makes it difficult to clear with.
I've taken more swings with the racket, enough to write a review.
Note. This review is my opinion of the racket from using it in my games. Take this with a pinch of salt since we all play the game differently. I'm here to tell you, in as much accuracy as I can, how my games went with the racket. Comments welcome!
Ok here goes.
Pro-Kennex Nano X2 9000
Est. Dry Weight: 94g (4u)
Grip Size: G5
Balance: Head Heavy
Flex: Stiff
Strings: Yonex BG66 Ultimax @ 25lbs
Before I start, I'd like to add that I've added about 2-3g of lead tape to the 2 and 10 o'clock of the racket.
I recommend this racket for doubles play.
Defense
I wrote in the First Impressions that the racket was fast in defense because of the 4U weight. However that was also the reason why it couldn't clear far. I hated not being able to clear far, so I added the lead tape to give it a little push at the back of the court.
However, this extra weight at the top of the racket was all it too to slow down the defensive swings considerably. The Pro-Kennex Nano X2 900 potentially can shug off attacks and have your oppoennts scrambling around trying to chase their own smashes, but for the duration of my matches with the lead-taped head, it's just at little bit slower, and I couldn't generate enough swing to punch it very far either.
Taking into account the slower speed to raise the racket above my head, the drive defenses also took a beating. Not that it wasn't fast, but I do remember the X2 9000 being a whole lot faster.
Attack
If the defense goes down because of the weight of the head, the attack will of course be directly be affected by it. The Pro-Kennex X2 9000 is able to delivery quality smashes down your enemy line.
Although equipped with power wedges at the 2 and 10 o'clock positions, the lead weight did much to help those two along the way. Think of the power wedge as the same as Yonex Voltric's Tri-Voltage weight system.
But the Pro-Kennex Nano X2 9000 really shines when it's at the front of the net, intercepting and getting them check and wrist smashes in. A simple turn of the wrist and the shuttle's on the floor before you know it.
Drive attacks seem to have taken a back seat though, which is a very strange thing for a light weight racket to have. I wasn't able to generate as much threat from my drives. I'd rather smash and drop with this
Control
Speaking of drops, the stiffness of the spiral graphite used to make the shaft adds plenty to control at the front court, if only the lousy shaped racket head didn't get in the way all the time.
Somehow I wasn't able to get as much agility and accuracy from this racket as I would let. the pushes were off to the side, the clears a little too far and the clears just aren't hitting the right spot.
That said, it was rather difficult to get into the game when half the time you're cursing the shuttle for hitting your frame so much. This applies to both the smashes, clears and especially net drops.
Looks
Green and black makes a pretty good combination, with the black spiral shaft coiling its way up the sculpture and melting the gloss covering to a matt finishing on the racket. Pro-Kennex showed a nice sense of design with this one.
Pro-Kennex Nano X2 9000
Defense: 7 (w tape), 9 (w/o)
Attack: 8 (w tape), 7 (w/o)
Control: 6
Looks: 8
Badminton Racket Review: Karakal BN-60
I've previously stated that this is one good racket, and the surprises just keep getting better. No way would I have guessed that such a light racket can deliver such power. In fact, that's the exact concern that I had before buying the racket.
Weighing in at an estimated 60g before stringing, the Karakal BN-60 has got to be the lightest racket I've ever laid my hands on.
The design is simple, underrated, and lends a sense of mystery to the latent potential that the BN-60 can bring to one's game.
Note. This review is my opinion of the racket from using it in my games. Take this with a pinch of salt since we all play the game differently. I'm here to tell you, in as much accuracy as I can, how my games went with the racket. Comments welcome!
Ok here goes.
Karakal BN-60
Est. Dry Weight: 60g (6U?)
Grip Size: Slightly thinner than the Yonex G5 size
Balance: Head Heavy
Flex: Stiff
Strings: Yonex BG66 Ultimax @ 25lbs
I recommend this racket if you want a great game.
Defense
Being super light, the Karakal BN-60 is naturally a naturally defensive racket at first try. The swings with the racket are super fast, lending a sharp swish sound to every swing.
The racket allows you to inject a lot of pace into your shots, imparting the full flow of your movement and wrist flicks into the shuttle at the very last minute without too much of the racket's weight slowing you down. I've found myself deep in defense, forced into a long stretch but still able to push off the shuttle with a backhand flick to the end of the court.
With such a quick reaction, taking the opponents on with counter-attacking drives is no problem. It's your reaction against his smashing stamina. With the lift to the back court coming so easily, toying the opponent around the two sides of the court is a breeze.
One thing I've noticed throughout the experience is that the BN-60 doesn't impart a lot of power on the drops and net blocks. I've been unable to use the weight of the racket to perform a nice net block when I needed it. It's either too high or I hit the net.
Attack
With the help of the head-heavy orientation, the Karakal BN-60 is able to pull off quite a mean attacking string. The first attack may not be the killer, but the subsequent follow-ups will have no lack of power since the racket is so light to yield.
Being so light also means that the wrist smashes can come down a lot faster, contributing to a very nice angle when you need the element of surprise.
Drives can be a problem though, without much weight in the overall racket to punch through. Although taking the return and putting it at another angle is totally in the equation. But I'd rather not factor in countering my opponent's return drive as an offensive strategy.
I think the racket shines when playing doubles. The BN-60 is the perfect weapon you'd want to have when covering the front court, being able to raise and drop without any difficult. This really adds up the threat level, especially if you've got a nice smasher taking the back court.
The Karakal BN-60 might also be a draw for the more creative players, what with the weight not being that much a consideration when performing last minute racket head movements or the occasional double movements. With head heaviness will ensure that you get enough depth when you're trying to force the opponent the wrong way, even if you're taking it later.
Control
Being able to hit all four corners of the court with ease gave me a very good feel about the BN-60. There was a level of comfort in my strokes, even when the occasional forced movement calls for a lesser-hit.
Be it coming down or going up, the Karakal BN-60 is able to meet most of my expectations. Although there might be a little problem with the net play...
Much like in defense, I've been unable to completely grasp the tight net shot with the BN-60. It's either too high or it hits the net, and I've even dropped the racket in frustration mid-game because of that.
I saw this problem in the Karakal SL-70. There was the pure lack of kinetic energy that I'm used to feeling from the heavier rackets.
Looks
I'll nickname it the Black Widow. The BN-60's black frame is sprinkled with red accents, lot allowing the paint to add any more weight to the frame. The usual silicone grip at the cone has been substituted with what seems to be a cheap sandpaper-like material, also red. The red strings complete the look - a lethal weapon that's small and light.
Weighing in at an estimated 60g before stringing, the Karakal BN-60 has got to be the lightest racket I've ever laid my hands on.
The design is simple, underrated, and lends a sense of mystery to the latent potential that the BN-60 can bring to one's game.
Note. This review is my opinion of the racket from using it in my games. Take this with a pinch of salt since we all play the game differently. I'm here to tell you, in as much accuracy as I can, how my games went with the racket. Comments welcome!
Ok here goes.
Karakal BN-60
Est. Dry Weight: 60g (6U?)
Grip Size: Slightly thinner than the Yonex G5 size
Balance: Head Heavy
Flex: Stiff
Strings: Yonex BG66 Ultimax @ 25lbs
I recommend this racket if you want a great game.
Defense
Being super light, the Karakal BN-60 is naturally a naturally defensive racket at first try. The swings with the racket are super fast, lending a sharp swish sound to every swing.
The racket allows you to inject a lot of pace into your shots, imparting the full flow of your movement and wrist flicks into the shuttle at the very last minute without too much of the racket's weight slowing you down. I've found myself deep in defense, forced into a long stretch but still able to push off the shuttle with a backhand flick to the end of the court.
With such a quick reaction, taking the opponents on with counter-attacking drives is no problem. It's your reaction against his smashing stamina. With the lift to the back court coming so easily, toying the opponent around the two sides of the court is a breeze.
One thing I've noticed throughout the experience is that the BN-60 doesn't impart a lot of power on the drops and net blocks. I've been unable to use the weight of the racket to perform a nice net block when I needed it. It's either too high or I hit the net.
Attack
With the help of the head-heavy orientation, the Karakal BN-60 is able to pull off quite a mean attacking string. The first attack may not be the killer, but the subsequent follow-ups will have no lack of power since the racket is so light to yield.
Being so light also means that the wrist smashes can come down a lot faster, contributing to a very nice angle when you need the element of surprise.
Drives can be a problem though, without much weight in the overall racket to punch through. Although taking the return and putting it at another angle is totally in the equation. But I'd rather not factor in countering my opponent's return drive as an offensive strategy.
I think the racket shines when playing doubles. The BN-60 is the perfect weapon you'd want to have when covering the front court, being able to raise and drop without any difficult. This really adds up the threat level, especially if you've got a nice smasher taking the back court.
The Karakal BN-60 might also be a draw for the more creative players, what with the weight not being that much a consideration when performing last minute racket head movements or the occasional double movements. With head heaviness will ensure that you get enough depth when you're trying to force the opponent the wrong way, even if you're taking it later.
Control
Being able to hit all four corners of the court with ease gave me a very good feel about the BN-60. There was a level of comfort in my strokes, even when the occasional forced movement calls for a lesser-hit.
Be it coming down or going up, the Karakal BN-60 is able to meet most of my expectations. Although there might be a little problem with the net play...
Much like in defense, I've been unable to completely grasp the tight net shot with the BN-60. It's either too high or it hits the net, and I've even dropped the racket in frustration mid-game because of that.
I saw this problem in the Karakal SL-70. There was the pure lack of kinetic energy that I'm used to feeling from the heavier rackets.
Looks
I'll nickname it the Black Widow. The BN-60's black frame is sprinkled with red accents, lot allowing the paint to add any more weight to the frame. The usual silicone grip at the cone has been substituted with what seems to be a cheap sandpaper-like material, also red. The red strings complete the look - a lethal weapon that's small and light.
Karakal BN-60
Defense: 10
Attack: 9
Control: 9
Looks: 8
Badminton Strings: Pro-Kennex Multi-Color
I just finished the morning session, and got the chance to try out a new string at a different tension than I normally play at.
While I'm pretty sure I got the name wrong, the new strings from Pro-Kennex have a to be of repulsion., and makes the smashes a real problem for the opponent.
And they're hard to miss since they are duo-tone.
Tomorrow I will try them again in doubles. Let's see how much harder my smashes will be.
While I'm pretty sure I got the name wrong, the new strings from Pro-Kennex have a to be of repulsion., and makes the smashes a real problem for the opponent.
And they're hard to miss since they are duo-tone.
Tomorrow I will try them again in doubles. Let's see how much harder my smashes will be.
The impact of a two-month break
It's been awhile since I wrote a review, and part of it.. scratch that, all of it is because of the two-month break that I had to take because of an injury.
Since then I've had the chance to procure myself some new rackets, and have been going through them in a rather random sequence. That explains the explosion of First Impressions that's been making their way onto these pages.
There've been some gems among the new purchases (Karakal BN60) and some misses (those didn't even make it to First Impressions), but I hope to put up the review of the BN60 soon.
It'll be put to the final test this weekend, when I get my game with a promising young boy who at this moment (or to my estimate) is at a school tryout.
All the best kid, and see you on Saturday!
Since then I've had the chance to procure myself some new rackets, and have been going through them in a rather random sequence. That explains the explosion of First Impressions that's been making their way onto these pages.
There've been some gems among the new purchases (Karakal BN60) and some misses (those didn't even make it to First Impressions), but I hope to put up the review of the BN60 soon.
It'll be put to the final test this weekend, when I get my game with a promising young boy who at this moment (or to my estimate) is at a school tryout.
All the best kid, and see you on Saturday!
Badminton Racket First Impressions: Yonex Armortec 700 (2nd Gen)
The is the racket made famous by Lin Dan when he was playing for Yonex. It's known for it's stiffness and extreme head heaviness.
And true to that, this racket proved unyielding as I took it to court. The clears and smashes came off pretty well, but the softer touches were sacrificed for them.
Drops and net shots were horrible for me, and the defense was one kind of slow. Lifting the head up to block shots became cumbersome and I see myself putting blocks I'd usually execute well into the net.
It'll take some time to tame. Correction: it'll take a lot of time to attempt to tame.
Stay tuned.
And true to that, this racket proved unyielding as I took it to court. The clears and smashes came off pretty well, but the softer touches were sacrificed for them.
Drops and net shots were horrible for me, and the defense was one kind of slow. Lifting the head up to block shots became cumbersome and I see myself putting blocks I'd usually execute well into the net.
It'll take some time to tame. Correction: it'll take a lot of time to attempt to tame.
Stay tuned.
Badminton Racket First Impressions: Yonex Nanospeed 9900
There's almost as much legend about this racket as the ArcSabers 10 and Z-Slash. It's got a very strong player base, and for a very good reason.
I finally got my hands on the Nanospeed 9900 a few days ago, had it restrung with my BG80 Power in orange, and then hit the courts for some singles action!
The racket is known for its hard smashes despite being a head light racket. The extra stiff shaft and the 2U weight for this one definitely added to the attacking power of the racket. I dare say that the Nanospeed 9900 trumps the NR700 in many aspects.
Drives, smashes, blocks and clears, the NS9900 does wonders.
I wonder if the speed will translate into a doubles game victory streak... Only time will tell, and of course, a review.
I finally got my hands on the Nanospeed 9900 a few days ago, had it restrung with my BG80 Power in orange, and then hit the courts for some singles action!
The racket is known for its hard smashes despite being a head light racket. The extra stiff shaft and the 2U weight for this one definitely added to the attacking power of the racket. I dare say that the Nanospeed 9900 trumps the NR700 in many aspects.
Drives, smashes, blocks and clears, the NS9900 does wonders.
I wonder if the speed will translate into a doubles game victory streak... Only time will tell, and of course, a review.
Badminton Strings: Yonex BG80 Power
It's been awhile since I wrote a review, and it might be a longer wait because I've yet to regain my form on the court... Footwork has slowly come back to me, though nowhere as fast as before, and the mis-hits have decreased.
Let's hope the next few sessions will do better for my technique.
For now, I'd like to give some attention to the strings. The Yonex BG80 Power to be exact. Seasoned users of the BG66 and BG66 Ultimax might not fancy the 0.69mm thickness of the string, but trust me when I say that this string is a must try for heavy smashers.
Since it's launch slightly before the Olympics this year, this string has become my go-to for doubles rackets. I'm not a heavy attacker during singles play, but I've learnt to channel more aggression when I'm on my doubles games and that means loads more shuttles coming down.
The Yonex BG80 Power gives me truck loads of power when it comes to the hard smashes. Excellent repulsion from the string bed means the shuttle leaves the racket double time, and the speed it launches at the opponent is amazing.
AND I've only got it at 23lbs. My singles rackets are strung at 25lbs.
Having the strings thicker also means there's more contact with the shuttle, and that makes the light shots easier to feel for me. I might just be a fan of thick strings, since I use the 0.68mm Yonex Nanogy primarily for singles play, but the BG80 Power really gave me a good feel with the variety of shots that I like to play throughout a match.
I've been searching around for good, reliable strings to fall back on, shuffling between the Nanogy 98 and BG66 Ultimax for the longest time, but it seems that the BG80 Power has filled the spot for doubles rackets.
For the win.
Let's hope the next few sessions will do better for my technique.
For now, I'd like to give some attention to the strings. The Yonex BG80 Power to be exact. Seasoned users of the BG66 and BG66 Ultimax might not fancy the 0.69mm thickness of the string, but trust me when I say that this string is a must try for heavy smashers.
Since it's launch slightly before the Olympics this year, this string has become my go-to for doubles rackets. I'm not a heavy attacker during singles play, but I've learnt to channel more aggression when I'm on my doubles games and that means loads more shuttles coming down.
The Yonex BG80 Power gives me truck loads of power when it comes to the hard smashes. Excellent repulsion from the string bed means the shuttle leaves the racket double time, and the speed it launches at the opponent is amazing.
AND I've only got it at 23lbs. My singles rackets are strung at 25lbs.
Having the strings thicker also means there's more contact with the shuttle, and that makes the light shots easier to feel for me. I might just be a fan of thick strings, since I use the 0.68mm Yonex Nanogy primarily for singles play, but the BG80 Power really gave me a good feel with the variety of shots that I like to play throughout a match.
I've been searching around for good, reliable strings to fall back on, shuffling between the Nanogy 98 and BG66 Ultimax for the longest time, but it seems that the BG80 Power has filled the spot for doubles rackets.
For the win.
Badminton Racket First Impressions: Karakal BN60
The guys at Karakal can really make rackets.. You think that something as light as the SL70 wouldn't be able to hit the shuttle as far and hard as a regular head-heavy racket, but it amazed me when it scores almost a perfect 10 in my books.
And just when you thought they couldn't go any further, they up and decreased the weight of their flagship racket by a whole 10 grams!
The BN60 didn't start off in my books as the wonderful piece of engineering it is. I was cautious as to whether something so light (60g unstrung) could manage hard hits like clears and smashes.
All that's gone out the window, and I've got a feeling we're looking at another perfect 10 racket.
More to come in the review.
And just when you thought they couldn't go any further, they up and decreased the weight of their flagship racket by a whole 10 grams!
The BN60 didn't start off in my books as the wonderful piece of engineering it is. I was cautious as to whether something so light (60g unstrung) could manage hard hits like clears and smashes.
All that's gone out the window, and I've got a feeling we're looking at another perfect 10 racket.
More to come in the review.
Badminton Racket Launch: Karakal BN60
Fans of the Karakal series of super light rackets have something to look forward to with the Ultralite BN60, the newest in the range of Karakal Rackets.
Really light with an unstrung frameweight of 60g, this is definitely a fast racket well-suited to the front court. As to whether this racket can perform with its smashes and blocks will be out to the test when I finally hit the courts this weekend.
"When I finally hit the courts this weekend..."
Has a very nice ring to it! :)
Really light with an unstrung frameweight of 60g, this is definitely a fast racket well-suited to the front court. As to whether this racket can perform with its smashes and blocks will be out to the test when I finally hit the courts this weekend.
"When I finally hit the courts this weekend..."
Has a very nice ring to it! :)
100,000 visits thank you challenge! Win a Bekia Meteor X80 Replica Racket!
Just a little celebration here because we've reached 100,000 views on this blog!
Special thanks goes out to the badminton fanatics who take the time to read up on the crazy things I write. I may not a very good player, but I try to get the most out of this hobby I have by sharing my experiences with the lot of players out there.
Thanks to all who comment and write in with questions - it's nice to know that people read and consider my opinions worth listening and debating about.
I'd like to try something new here, with a little incentive of course. Don't know if it'll fly but anything's worth trying I guess.
I've been sharing my love for the game and my experiences with rackets and game strategies. I'd like to hear from you, and I've got a little reward for what I think is the best entry.
Time for you to be badminton bloggers!
The Challenge
I've got three topics for you to choose from. Each entry will pick one topic and write a blog entry on it. The entries will be accompanied with your personal details, sent to my email address, so that I can eliminate duplicate entries.
At the end of it, I'm giving out a Bekia Meteor X80 Replica worth S$70 to the best entry. Be creative, be impressive, but most importantly, be passionate.
Terms and Conditions:
Special thanks goes out to the badminton fanatics who take the time to read up on the crazy things I write. I may not a very good player, but I try to get the most out of this hobby I have by sharing my experiences with the lot of players out there.
Thanks to all who comment and write in with questions - it's nice to know that people read and consider my opinions worth listening and debating about.
I'd like to try something new here, with a little incentive of course. Don't know if it'll fly but anything's worth trying I guess.
I've been sharing my love for the game and my experiences with rackets and game strategies. I'd like to hear from you, and I've got a little reward for what I think is the best entry.
Time for you to be badminton bloggers!
The Challenge
I've got three topics for you to choose from. Each entry will pick one topic and write a blog entry on it. The entries will be accompanied with your personal details, sent to my email address, so that I can eliminate duplicate entries.
At the end of it, I'm giving out a Bekia Meteor X80 Replica worth S$70 to the best entry. Be creative, be impressive, but most importantly, be passionate.
- What's your most memorable moment in badminton?
- What's your favorite racket and why?
- What is your favorite strategy / tactic when playing the game of badminton?
Judging
At close, I will read all entries and choose a winner based on my digression, and I'll notify the winner via email or SMS on collection of the racket. No disputing please, unless you have a prize to give out to your favorite entry as well :)
Terms and Conditions:
- Blogging Challenge is open till 30 November 2012, 12 midnight Singapore time
- Challenge is open to all Singapore addresses only
- Limited to one entry per person, to be determined by NRIC No.
- No word limit
- All entries to be sent to arthur.wdx@gmail.com with subject "Badminton Blogging Challenge"
- Entries must be accompanied with the following details - (i) name, (ii) mobile number, (iii) email address, (iv) last 4 digits of NRIC No.
- By entering this challenge, all participants will agree to have their entries be subject to editing and posting on this blog to share with the community
- I will bear no responsibility for the misuse of entries published on this blog
- This Challenge is only valid if I receive more than 20 entries
- I can change Terms and Conditions of this Challenge without prior notice
Taller
Words. Plain and simple.
They make, they destroy. They are placed, taken, dissected, chewed, held; broken down into bare molecular facets of their completed whole, then re-assembled with varying delicacy to varying results befitting a variable response from the intended audience.
Words are ironic.
And by these words, with words subject to your varying deconstructions, I present.
They come to me as faint whispers, soft sharp voices I ought to not hear.
But I do, and they fend me off like water sliding from a flower's petal.
Sometimes sunny, sometimes cast, mostly disturbing (but in a good way), always memorable.
Cold to the touch, hard to hold on; fleeting, its warmth; calming, its effects on me.
It causes repetition, like an overplayed tune, but without the placidity. The same words, over and over, whispered in echoes, carried in song, taken and liked.
My words, to my tastes, for your palette.
They make, they destroy. They are placed, taken, dissected, chewed, held; broken down into bare molecular facets of their completed whole, then re-assembled with varying delicacy to varying results befitting a variable response from the intended audience.
Words are ironic.
And by these words, with words subject to your varying deconstructions, I present.
They come to me as faint whispers, soft sharp voices I ought to not hear.
But I do, and they fend me off like water sliding from a flower's petal.
Sometimes sunny, sometimes cast, mostly disturbing (but in a good way), always memorable.
Cold to the touch, hard to hold on; fleeting, its warmth; calming, its effects on me.
It causes repetition, like an overplayed tune, but without the placidity. The same words, over and over, whispered in echoes, carried in song, taken and liked.
My words, to my tastes, for your palette.
Out of Shape
Not playing for about a month has been hard on the body, both physically and mentally. Especially physically.
I notice the flabs starting to form, and it's now a concerted effort to eat less. I think I'll have to get my feet back to the jogging track. Hope that the muscles will be able to take light jogging.
Mentally, it's torturous to not be able to play badminton. Since I started getting serious in wanting to play the game about 3 years back, I've played an average of at least twice a week. Stopping cold turkey like this isn't a good way to treat the mind.
On the bright side, the muscles have been recovering at a good rate since visiting the physiotherapist and the complete stopping of all things sport.
For now, at least to fight the flabs from ruining my shirts and pants, I'll have to start the circuit routine at home and put on my jogging shoes.
Oh, and eat less.
I notice the flabs starting to form, and it's now a concerted effort to eat less. I think I'll have to get my feet back to the jogging track. Hope that the muscles will be able to take light jogging.
Mentally, it's torturous to not be able to play badminton. Since I started getting serious in wanting to play the game about 3 years back, I've played an average of at least twice a week. Stopping cold turkey like this isn't a good way to treat the mind.
On the bright side, the muscles have been recovering at a good rate since visiting the physiotherapist and the complete stopping of all things sport.
For now, at least to fight the flabs from ruining my shirts and pants, I'll have to start the circuit routine at home and put on my jogging shoes.
Oh, and eat less.
*POLL* Fair to Tell?
In light of the rackets being sold out there in the forums, I'd like to get everyone's opinion on whether someone who's trying to sell or trade a racket bought from the sale should state it out-front.
It's on the right (sorry the template is not very myopic-friendly); please take part.
It's on the right (sorry the template is not very myopic-friendly); please take part.
Trade Info: Yonex ArcSaber 8DX
I've seen a couple of trades being posted up on the forums already, and I thought I'd sound it out for those who weren't aware of the Yonex warehouse sale.
Buyer beware. The racket was available for sale at $100.
Here are some of the characteristics of the Yonex warehouse sale 8DX:
Buyer beware. The racket was available for sale at $100.
Here are some of the characteristics of the Yonex warehouse sale 8DX:
- Unstrung
- Comes in ArcSaber single-racket bag
- 3UG4 or 3UG5
- Does not have Sunrise Sticker
But then, the choice is up to you.
Yonex Warehouse Sales
When my colleagues told me about the sale, the first thing that came to my mind was, "Those guys will never put up the high-end rackets out for sale! 80% from $499 is more like it..."
But lo and behold...
ArcSaber 8DX going for $100, ArcSaber 9FLs going for $80, Armortec 900P LC going for $120...
Madness. Yonex is trying to put distributors out of business. I expect a whole lot of rackets being put up for sale on the forums soon.
Some dealers were also seen there. You'd want to be wary of "discount" prices for the above rackets since you know where they got their stock. All rackets from the sale didn't come with the Sunrise sticker, and do not enjoy the warranty period of 3 months.
But that aside, you might want to head down there for a squeeze to try and get a good deal.
But lo and behold...
ArcSaber 8DX going for $100, ArcSaber 9FLs going for $80, Armortec 900P LC going for $120...
Madness. Yonex is trying to put distributors out of business. I expect a whole lot of rackets being put up for sale on the forums soon.
Some dealers were also seen there. You'd want to be wary of "discount" prices for the above rackets since you know where they got their stock. All rackets from the sale didn't come with the Sunrise sticker, and do not enjoy the warranty period of 3 months.
But that aside, you might want to head down there for a squeeze to try and get a good deal.
The First
Looking through my rackets (because that's the only thing I can do now), I find myself stopping to appreciate the first racket that started the collection craze.
The Carlton Fireblade FX8 is an engineering marvel, and it's still one of the rackets that make me feel so at ease.
So here's my paying homage to it.
For all you badminton nuts out there, please do the same and give a moment to your first rackets. Come share.
The Carlton Fireblade FX8 is an engineering marvel, and it's still one of the rackets that make me feel so at ease.
So here's my paying homage to it.
For all you badminton nuts out there, please do the same and give a moment to your first rackets. Come share.
Watching the world move
I can feel my skills slowly fade away as I nurse the injury to my thigh...
On the bright side, I've been able to catch up on some of the matches that I've not had the time to watch. I'm really looking forward to the rising stars of badminton, especially in the Women's Singles discipline.
There's the super talented Ratchanok Intanon, who's already three-time (and I'm guess a fourth) World Junior Champion. She's got a nice relaxed playing style, throwing a lot of deception into her strokes especially the feign lift to net drop that she tends to do a lot of.
Check out her grip on the racket, it's amazing. But when it comes to crunch time, her shots tend to go a little wayward and the grip will tighten. With more experience she'll be used to her opponents requiring a lot more shots to take down.
Young Intanon seems to have found a nemesis with World Number One Wang Yihan. The couple have met with Intanon's defeat several times already. But I have high hopes for this young champion. She will best the Chinese yet.
I recently had the chance to watch the 2012 Li-Ning China Masters, and there was this very raw Indian lady by the name of Pusarla Venkata Sindhu. She beat current Olympic Champion Li Xuerui in the quarterfinals.
Sindhu and Intanon have very different playing styles. Sindhu's the hard worker who can be a very good retriever with time. The long lanky lass gave Li a good run for her money, returning winners and forcing the Olympic Champion to make several unforced errors.
Being tall, she's also able to get very good angles on the cross courts, and she's got a habit of performing the drop shots from her left using the overhead. I guess it's an acceptable shot since she's able to scamper with no worries to the far side if her opponent should ever return it.
This young lady's also got an incredible smash, if she's ever given a chance to use it. She's still distant from Intanon's level, but it's promising to see these two give the Chinese a run for their money.
Man I miss being on the court...
On the bright side, I've been able to catch up on some of the matches that I've not had the time to watch. I'm really looking forward to the rising stars of badminton, especially in the Women's Singles discipline.
.jpg) |
| Photo: Yonex.com |
Check out her grip on the racket, it's amazing. But when it comes to crunch time, her shots tend to go a little wayward and the grip will tighten. With more experience she'll be used to her opponents requiring a lot more shots to take down.
Young Intanon seems to have found a nemesis with World Number One Wang Yihan. The couple have met with Intanon's defeat several times already. But I have high hopes for this young champion. She will best the Chinese yet.
I recently had the chance to watch the 2012 Li-Ning China Masters, and there was this very raw Indian lady by the name of Pusarla Venkata Sindhu. She beat current Olympic Champion Li Xuerui in the quarterfinals.
 |
| Photo: India Times |
Being tall, she's also able to get very good angles on the cross courts, and she's got a habit of performing the drop shots from her left using the overhead. I guess it's an acceptable shot since she's able to scamper with no worries to the far side if her opponent should ever return it.
This young lady's also got an incredible smash, if she's ever given a chance to use it. She's still distant from Intanon's level, but it's promising to see these two give the Chinese a run for their money.
Man I miss being on the court...
Badminton Racket First Impressions: Pro-Kennex Nano X2 9000
From the first racket I bought when I picked up the sport, to the first I've ever had.
This brand brings back memories. I can't remember the model that I owned back in primary school, but it's great to see the brand up and rising.
The Nano X2 9000 isn't the first of the new series of Pro-Kennex rackets, but it's easily the nicest looking. Giving me a reason to finally use green strings, the racket is half matte and half gloss-finished, giving it a very unique texture as you run your hands along it.
It's got a great swing too, very fast and very sharp thanks to the light weight and the even balance. the resultant drive is very, very fast. I dare say one of the fastest that I've ever thrown (and this is comparing it to the Yonex Voltric Z-Force).
Smashes with the wrist also come off very well, and that makes securing the net a very fun affair. Some things add to this - the power wedge at the 2 and 10 o'clock position of the head frame, and the new spiral graphite shaft that adds to the stiffness.
Light weight plus extra stiff shaft plus slight weight orientation at the front equals a very fast smash for those who use very little swing.
But one thing that's missing is the weight. Standing at 4U, the racket seems to be very difficult to clear with. I usually play at 23lbs for doubles, but the aerodynamics of the Pro-Kennex Nano X2 9000 (and the overall green color scheme) made me switch to BG66 Ultimax @ 25lbs.
Perhaps it's the tightening of the strings, perhaps it's the construction of the racket, but the clears on this were very disappointing. It's even shorter than my head light rackets.
Maybe more practice will help. Review soon.
This brand brings back memories. I can't remember the model that I owned back in primary school, but it's great to see the brand up and rising.
The Nano X2 9000 isn't the first of the new series of Pro-Kennex rackets, but it's easily the nicest looking. Giving me a reason to finally use green strings, the racket is half matte and half gloss-finished, giving it a very unique texture as you run your hands along it.
It's got a great swing too, very fast and very sharp thanks to the light weight and the even balance. the resultant drive is very, very fast. I dare say one of the fastest that I've ever thrown (and this is comparing it to the Yonex Voltric Z-Force).
Smashes with the wrist also come off very well, and that makes securing the net a very fun affair. Some things add to this - the power wedge at the 2 and 10 o'clock position of the head frame, and the new spiral graphite shaft that adds to the stiffness.
Light weight plus extra stiff shaft plus slight weight orientation at the front equals a very fast smash for those who use very little swing.
But one thing that's missing is the weight. Standing at 4U, the racket seems to be very difficult to clear with. I usually play at 23lbs for doubles, but the aerodynamics of the Pro-Kennex Nano X2 9000 (and the overall green color scheme) made me switch to BG66 Ultimax @ 25lbs.
Perhaps it's the tightening of the strings, perhaps it's the construction of the racket, but the clears on this were very disappointing. It's even shorter than my head light rackets.
Maybe more practice will help. Review soon.
Training Racket: Yonex Carbonex 6000DF
Being injured means I can finally blog about my training racket, which I'm currently using to increase the strength of my swings.
This here is my very first racket - something that I bought when I wanted to pick up the sport about three years back. Since then I've improved somewhat in my technique and endurance, and it's partly in thanks to this training racket.
So here's my special post to my training buddy - the Yonex Carbonex 6000DF. Weighing in at about 120g, and accompanied with a racket head cover with holes (to make sure my swings are true and not deflected by the wind resistance, I owe quite a bit of my power to this here racket.
Join hands.
This here is my very first racket - something that I bought when I wanted to pick up the sport about three years back. Since then I've improved somewhat in my technique and endurance, and it's partly in thanks to this training racket.
So here's my special post to my training buddy - the Yonex Carbonex 6000DF. Weighing in at about 120g, and accompanied with a racket head cover with holes (to make sure my swings are true and not deflected by the wind resistance, I owe quite a bit of my power to this here racket.
Join hands.
For Sale: Victor Bravesword 15
Up for grabs is a like-new condition Victor Bravesword 15.
No scratches, peels, or *gasp* chips
Now strung with Yonex BG80 Power @ 23lbs
Original grip removed
HK-Coded
Singapore only
S$150
Injury
I've come down with an injury to my right thigh that will probably keep me away from the game for about a month...
Expect less reviews and previews. I'll try to catch up on the strategy portion though - I've not completed the set which I've started a long time ago.
Here's hoping.
Expect less reviews and previews. I'll try to catch up on the strategy portion though - I've not completed the set which I've started a long time ago.
Here's hoping.
Racket Wishlist
It's been awhile since any rackets interested me... Got a new one over the weekend, but here's something that a lot of people on the forums are talking about.
The Yonex ArcSaber 8DX.
Stiff, even balanced, quite an attractive design.
To go or not to go? Anyone care to share their experiences with this?
The Yonex ArcSaber 8DX.
Stiff, even balanced, quite an attractive design.
To go or not to go? Anyone care to share their experiences with this?
Sungazer
"... and through the years she stood alone, touched by the rising sun, each year gleaming more brilliantly than the last."
I rested my foot on the platform next to the monument. We took months to travel here, to where time froze and nothing has a name.
I've spent the last few days looking at the statue of the lonesome goddess as we made our way up to the pinnacle. The ancient people must have adored her; she stands atop the highest point for miles, casting her sad smile into the ridges and canopy below.
On her right where my feet now rest lay a platform, half a foot in height alike the one she stood on. Several lifetimes of erosion left a mystery to whether anything once stood beside her.
Archeologists have a theory based one key evidence.
"A ring is a terrible thing to see on the fingers of such a beautiful creature."
There was a coating of copper on the ring carved onto her left hand. When the sun shone it gleamed gold and bright - a signal more than a symbol.
I put my other foot onto the platform, raising myself to take in the view. I look left, and noticed the goddess and her gaze.
"It's like she's searching, waiting."
Some things are meant to be hidden from the world, and as much as I wanted to excavate this wonder for my museum, I was stopped cold.
Not by the splendor of the sun against the stone, not by a sense of respect for the ancient people.
As we made our way back to camp and home, I caught myself looking back at her constantly.
Many features on the statue marked it magnificent, but none more than her eyes. They capture me, not allowing me to leave, ripping at my chest and making it hollow.
Till today I think of the lone statue in the lost city and her patient gaze over the land. I imagine myself among the people of the ages, asking around, seeking an answer.
So beautiful, yet alone. So yearning, yet patient. So sad, yet smiling - cast in stone, eternal she stands, in place by her own, where sun rules the land.
I rested my foot on the platform next to the monument. We took months to travel here, to where time froze and nothing has a name.
I've spent the last few days looking at the statue of the lonesome goddess as we made our way up to the pinnacle. The ancient people must have adored her; she stands atop the highest point for miles, casting her sad smile into the ridges and canopy below.
On her right where my feet now rest lay a platform, half a foot in height alike the one she stood on. Several lifetimes of erosion left a mystery to whether anything once stood beside her.
Archeologists have a theory based one key evidence.
"A ring is a terrible thing to see on the fingers of such a beautiful creature."
There was a coating of copper on the ring carved onto her left hand. When the sun shone it gleamed gold and bright - a signal more than a symbol.
I put my other foot onto the platform, raising myself to take in the view. I look left, and noticed the goddess and her gaze.
"It's like she's searching, waiting."
Some things are meant to be hidden from the world, and as much as I wanted to excavate this wonder for my museum, I was stopped cold.
Not by the splendor of the sun against the stone, not by a sense of respect for the ancient people.
As we made our way back to camp and home, I caught myself looking back at her constantly.
Many features on the statue marked it magnificent, but none more than her eyes. They capture me, not allowing me to leave, ripping at my chest and making it hollow.
Till today I think of the lone statue in the lost city and her patient gaze over the land. I imagine myself among the people of the ages, asking around, seeking an answer.
So beautiful, yet alone. So yearning, yet patient. So sad, yet smiling - cast in stone, eternal she stands, in place by her own, where sun rules the land.
Badminton Racket First Impressions: Bekia Meteor X80 Replica
Here's another one of the quality rackets from budget makers Bekia, this time modeled after the infamous Victor Meteor X80.
There lies a power in this racket that I can't describe. When you pull off a good smash with the Bekia Meteor X80 Replica, you can feel so much power.
Too bad that power comes at a cost. There's also something funny about how this racket feels that lets me perform the most number of mis-hits that I've ever remembered myself doing.
The saving grace being, that in a few more strokes, you'll more or less get used to the length and speed.
Rather confusing and hard to comment on for now, so let me get a few games with this and I'll see if it's enough for me to handle this potential masterpiece.
There lies a power in this racket that I can't describe. When you pull off a good smash with the Bekia Meteor X80 Replica, you can feel so much power.
Too bad that power comes at a cost. There's also something funny about how this racket feels that lets me perform the most number of mis-hits that I've ever remembered myself doing.
The saving grace being, that in a few more strokes, you'll more or less get used to the length and speed.
Rather confusing and hard to comment on for now, so let me get a few games with this and I'll see if it's enough for me to handle this potential masterpiece.
Badminton Racket Review: Yonex Nanoray 700RP
Hands up those who prefer head heavy rackets. Hands up those who like to smash. Hands up those who think light rackets can't be used well for smashing.
I used to belong to the head heavy camp, where a good smash can come off so easily from one of the Voltrics or Armortecs. I've also admired the speed of the even balances, able to trade some of the power off for a little more agility and defense rating.
For the longest time I've not got any head light rackets. I've tried light weight, head heavy rackets, and they mostly don't work (with the exception of the Karakal SL-70). The has given me a sort of bad rep on the head lights.
Until my game evolved and I embraced the defense portion of badminton. I grew to like taking a stance, waiting for the big smash and then diverting it away where the opponent can't reach. It's a good trade-off. I use very little energy to counter and win over a big spend by the opponent.
That's when I sprung for the Yonex Nanoray 700RP. And that was a pretty good decision.
The Nanoray 700 series comes in two variations - RP (repulsion) and FX (flex). The two gives you a very nice choice between a stiff shaft for wrist movements and quick swings, and a slightly more flexible one for you long swingers out there.
Worth notice is the thick width of the head frame, a very different approach from the newer ranges that the badminton giant has to offer. This thick frame seems to be lending more power to the shots, allowing for better shot placement and power in both the rackets. At least for me anyway.
Note. This review is my opinion of the racket from using it in my games. Take this with a pinch of salt since we all play the game differently. I'm here to tell you, in as much accuracy as I can, hwo my games went with the racket. Comments welcome!
Ok here goes.
Yonex Nanoray 700RP
Est. Dry Weight: 86g (3U)
Grip Size: G5
Balance: Head Light
Flex: Stiff
Strings: Yonex BG80 Power @ 23lbs
I recommend this racket for doubles play.
Defense
Head light rackets are amazing when it comes to defending. You get mad speed on demand, twisting and turning the racket to suit the shot that you want to pull off. The Yonex Nanoray 700RP will tempt you to take the net, and with due reason too.
Reflex is king when you're playing up front, and the NR700RP will definitely cause some worry for the opponent. Bringing the racket up from your hip is super fast, and you'll get one hell of a time blocking off the shots at the net.
Going along the lines of the fast lifting speed, the Nanoray 700RP's quickness also translates to when you're receiving smashes. The racket gives you enough speed to tackle even the hardest smashes.
The biggest problems I've faced with head light rackets is the lack of weight in the front, and that means that your defense will not usually go as far as you want to without a little more effort. However, the Yonex Nanoray 700RP doesn't seem to suffer from that problem. The stiff shaft of the racket gives you the added power to push the shuttle higher off a defensive stroke.
Add this to the already fast movement speed and supreme agility, and you've got a tough defense to match any would-be berserker.
Attack
If you've ever used a head heavy racket like the Voltrics or N90s, you'll find the attack in this racket slightly lacking. It's got a similar feel to the N90 when you come for a smash - there's a solid thump that accompanies each smash as the shaft tightens around the shuttle and transmits the power from your stroke onto the attacking shuttle.
I've heard of people giving up their Nanospeeds because they're not able to get distance with the rackets. it takes a little practice, but once you get the hang of the weight transfer, the Nanoray 700RP will become quite the attacking force.
I'm at 23lbs and I can feel the shuttle explode off the string bed already. Users of higher tension will most certainly get a more satisfying experience with this.
However fast the overhead shots, I find myself liking to drive with the NR700RP. The stiff shaft allows for very quick energy transfer from the wrist without losing too much to the flex, and this comes off really handy when you want to whip the head around a shuttle coming to you at net height.
The drives (defense and offense) are very fast, and the good thing is you recover quickly because of the weight of the racket head, ready to intercept any potential counter drive or push that your opponent might have.
Being light around the head also gives you a very good mobility rating. I would say that you'll be able to contact the shuttle ahead of your usual, especially if you're going up for the net kill.
Control
Last but not least, the most important spec of a racket. To me, being powerful isn't really a good thing until you can aim it. The Yonex Nanoray 700RP gives you superb control, it's almost perfect.
I demand a really high percentage of the shots I hit. No mishits, no weaker shots, no shuttles going where I didn't intent them to; each shuttle has to leave the string bed and go exactly where I want them to. At least that's what I try for anyway.
The NR700RP cuts it pretty close, taking my shot making to new level with tight net shots, clinical drives and smashes along with very threatening counter defenses.
Fans of trick shots can also know that it's really easy to pull them off with this racket. It's speed and accuracy allows for a very tactical play.
Looks
Orange and brown and shiny alien white. This must be one of the more unorthodox color combinations that Yonex has come up with, successfully.
The Nanoray 700RP looks very streamline, very futuristic. It's like beams of light are flying off the racket. Matched it with orange strings and grip.
I used to belong to the head heavy camp, where a good smash can come off so easily from one of the Voltrics or Armortecs. I've also admired the speed of the even balances, able to trade some of the power off for a little more agility and defense rating.
For the longest time I've not got any head light rackets. I've tried light weight, head heavy rackets, and they mostly don't work (with the exception of the Karakal SL-70). The has given me a sort of bad rep on the head lights.
Until my game evolved and I embraced the defense portion of badminton. I grew to like taking a stance, waiting for the big smash and then diverting it away where the opponent can't reach. It's a good trade-off. I use very little energy to counter and win over a big spend by the opponent.
That's when I sprung for the Yonex Nanoray 700RP. And that was a pretty good decision.
The Nanoray 700 series comes in two variations - RP (repulsion) and FX (flex). The two gives you a very nice choice between a stiff shaft for wrist movements and quick swings, and a slightly more flexible one for you long swingers out there.
Worth notice is the thick width of the head frame, a very different approach from the newer ranges that the badminton giant has to offer. This thick frame seems to be lending more power to the shots, allowing for better shot placement and power in both the rackets. At least for me anyway.
Note. This review is my opinion of the racket from using it in my games. Take this with a pinch of salt since we all play the game differently. I'm here to tell you, in as much accuracy as I can, hwo my games went with the racket. Comments welcome!
Ok here goes.
Yonex Nanoray 700RP
Est. Dry Weight: 86g (3U)
Grip Size: G5
Balance: Head Light
Flex: Stiff
Strings: Yonex BG80 Power @ 23lbs
I recommend this racket for doubles play.
Defense
Head light rackets are amazing when it comes to defending. You get mad speed on demand, twisting and turning the racket to suit the shot that you want to pull off. The Yonex Nanoray 700RP will tempt you to take the net, and with due reason too.
Reflex is king when you're playing up front, and the NR700RP will definitely cause some worry for the opponent. Bringing the racket up from your hip is super fast, and you'll get one hell of a time blocking off the shots at the net.
Going along the lines of the fast lifting speed, the Nanoray 700RP's quickness also translates to when you're receiving smashes. The racket gives you enough speed to tackle even the hardest smashes.
The biggest problems I've faced with head light rackets is the lack of weight in the front, and that means that your defense will not usually go as far as you want to without a little more effort. However, the Yonex Nanoray 700RP doesn't seem to suffer from that problem. The stiff shaft of the racket gives you the added power to push the shuttle higher off a defensive stroke.
Add this to the already fast movement speed and supreme agility, and you've got a tough defense to match any would-be berserker.
Attack
If you've ever used a head heavy racket like the Voltrics or N90s, you'll find the attack in this racket slightly lacking. It's got a similar feel to the N90 when you come for a smash - there's a solid thump that accompanies each smash as the shaft tightens around the shuttle and transmits the power from your stroke onto the attacking shuttle.
I've heard of people giving up their Nanospeeds because they're not able to get distance with the rackets. it takes a little practice, but once you get the hang of the weight transfer, the Nanoray 700RP will become quite the attacking force.
I'm at 23lbs and I can feel the shuttle explode off the string bed already. Users of higher tension will most certainly get a more satisfying experience with this.
However fast the overhead shots, I find myself liking to drive with the NR700RP. The stiff shaft allows for very quick energy transfer from the wrist without losing too much to the flex, and this comes off really handy when you want to whip the head around a shuttle coming to you at net height.
The drives (defense and offense) are very fast, and the good thing is you recover quickly because of the weight of the racket head, ready to intercept any potential counter drive or push that your opponent might have.
Being light around the head also gives you a very good mobility rating. I would say that you'll be able to contact the shuttle ahead of your usual, especially if you're going up for the net kill.
Control
Last but not least, the most important spec of a racket. To me, being powerful isn't really a good thing until you can aim it. The Yonex Nanoray 700RP gives you superb control, it's almost perfect.
I demand a really high percentage of the shots I hit. No mishits, no weaker shots, no shuttles going where I didn't intent them to; each shuttle has to leave the string bed and go exactly where I want them to. At least that's what I try for anyway.
The NR700RP cuts it pretty close, taking my shot making to new level with tight net shots, clinical drives and smashes along with very threatening counter defenses.
Fans of trick shots can also know that it's really easy to pull them off with this racket. It's speed and accuracy allows for a very tactical play.
Looks
Orange and brown and shiny alien white. This must be one of the more unorthodox color combinations that Yonex has come up with, successfully.
The Nanoray 700RP looks very streamline, very futuristic. It's like beams of light are flying off the racket. Matched it with orange strings and grip.
Yonex Nanoray 700RP
Defense: 10
Attack: 7
Control: 10
Looks: 9
Badminton Racket Launch: Yonex Nanoray 800
Here's badminton giant Yonex at its game once again with the Yonex Nanoray 800. It's more head heavy and stiff than the 700 series, according to the matrix chart.
This here's got 2 more technological advances from Yonex.
FX Plus: a hybrid material incorporated into the end of the shaft near the cone for greater flexibility to address the tougher clear shots we all get from head-light rackets. Looks like a dovetail build that allows for greater movement at the base.
Sonic Metal: new material at the top of the frame that increases repulsion and gives a better clear sound. Since I've yet to hear a Voltric 80 giving me the shivers, I'm going to call bluff on this one.
Check out more on the Yonex Website.
This here's got 2 more technological advances from Yonex.
FX Plus: a hybrid material incorporated into the end of the shaft near the cone for greater flexibility to address the tougher clear shots we all get from head-light rackets. Looks like a dovetail build that allows for greater movement at the base.
Sonic Metal: new material at the top of the frame that increases repulsion and gives a better clear sound. Since I've yet to hear a Voltric 80 giving me the shivers, I'm going to call bluff on this one.
Check out more on the Yonex Website.
Badminton Racket Review: Carlton Airblade 35
This is another one of those that escaped my GAS when I was Carlton crazy. It was elusive until I had the chance to get a second-hand one at a good condition from a guy from BC.
This is also the racket that changed my mind about the string tension that I normally use. It came strung with NBG98 @ 25lbs, which I initially thought was too high for me. Upon more frequent use I found that the 1lbs increase from my usual is actually a good thing, and it stuck ever since.
As for how the racket performed, I had thought it felt like the wonderful Fireblade FX8, but the more I use it the more it's got its own feel.
This review's my opinion of the racket form using it in my games, my style, so take this with a pinch of salt. I'm here to tell you, in as much accuracy as I can, how my games went with the racket. Comments welcome!
Ok here goes.
Carlton Airblade 35
Est. Dry Weight: 84g (4U)
Grip Size: G5
Balance: Even
Max String Tension: 28lbs
Flex: Medium
Strings: Yonex Nanogy 98 @ 25 lbs
I use this racket for singles play, but seriously recommend it for doubles.
Defense
This racket is fast. And with an even balance, it's got enough push to send the shots to where you want to get an advantage. Swinging the racket around gives you a nice and sharp swoosh, not a very common trait in rackets unless you're wielding a Bravesword.
However, the flex in the shaft doesn't help much when you want to give a good lift to the back of the court from a smash. Those who like to test their defenses and tired the opponent out with high lifts should take note of this.
To make up for the lack of lifting prowess, the Carlton Airblade 35's drive defense is impressive. I'm able to whip the racket around to push the shuttle nice and flat across the sides. It's one of my favorite form of defenses, and this racket allows me to pull it off with ease.
Attack
Here's where this falls a little short. The flex in the shaft adds well enough to the attack, but given the light weight of the frame, it's better off being stiff if you're after something with a little more threat. Smashes with the Carlton Airblade 35 come off the string bed with a loud punch, but somehow the shuttles don't travel fast enough for my liking.
Your best bet with this racket is probably the drive shots, since the lighter frame allows the execution of one fast wrist snap.
Control
This didn't feel as good as I thought it would. There's a missing feel that most other good rackets will have. The shots coming off the Airblade 35 are a little softer to feel, a little loose, and a little too unpredictable for my liking.
I wasn't able to place the shuttle as well as I wanted to, and this affected the quality of defensive and attacking shots in the game. I'd blame this on the softer flex of the shaft, which makes me wonder if 4U rackets should just all be stiff so that the control doesn't suffer much.
Looks
The elegant Carlton Airblade 35 comes in black with white accents throughout the head frame and shaft. The signature rubber grommets, the predecessor of the V12, are placed at the 3 and 9 o'clock positions, yellow and outstanding from the black and white of the overall design.
Very sleek.
This is also the racket that changed my mind about the string tension that I normally use. It came strung with NBG98 @ 25lbs, which I initially thought was too high for me. Upon more frequent use I found that the 1lbs increase from my usual is actually a good thing, and it stuck ever since.
As for how the racket performed, I had thought it felt like the wonderful Fireblade FX8, but the more I use it the more it's got its own feel.
This review's my opinion of the racket form using it in my games, my style, so take this with a pinch of salt. I'm here to tell you, in as much accuracy as I can, how my games went with the racket. Comments welcome!
Ok here goes.
Carlton Airblade 35
Est. Dry Weight: 84g (4U)
Grip Size: G5
Balance: Even
Max String Tension: 28lbs
Flex: Medium
Strings: Yonex Nanogy 98 @ 25 lbs
I use this racket for singles play, but seriously recommend it for doubles.
Defense
This racket is fast. And with an even balance, it's got enough push to send the shots to where you want to get an advantage. Swinging the racket around gives you a nice and sharp swoosh, not a very common trait in rackets unless you're wielding a Bravesword.
However, the flex in the shaft doesn't help much when you want to give a good lift to the back of the court from a smash. Those who like to test their defenses and tired the opponent out with high lifts should take note of this.
To make up for the lack of lifting prowess, the Carlton Airblade 35's drive defense is impressive. I'm able to whip the racket around to push the shuttle nice and flat across the sides. It's one of my favorite form of defenses, and this racket allows me to pull it off with ease.
Attack
Here's where this falls a little short. The flex in the shaft adds well enough to the attack, but given the light weight of the frame, it's better off being stiff if you're after something with a little more threat. Smashes with the Carlton Airblade 35 come off the string bed with a loud punch, but somehow the shuttles don't travel fast enough for my liking.
Your best bet with this racket is probably the drive shots, since the lighter frame allows the execution of one fast wrist snap.
Control
This didn't feel as good as I thought it would. There's a missing feel that most other good rackets will have. The shots coming off the Airblade 35 are a little softer to feel, a little loose, and a little too unpredictable for my liking.
I wasn't able to place the shuttle as well as I wanted to, and this affected the quality of defensive and attacking shots in the game. I'd blame this on the softer flex of the shaft, which makes me wonder if 4U rackets should just all be stiff so that the control doesn't suffer much.
Looks
The elegant Carlton Airblade 35 comes in black with white accents throughout the head frame and shaft. The signature rubber grommets, the predecessor of the V12, are placed at the 3 and 9 o'clock positions, yellow and outstanding from the black and white of the overall design.
Very sleek.
Carlton Airblade 35
Defense: 8
Attack: 7
Control: 7
Looks: 8
Badminton Technique: Counting Four
I had a conversation with a friend over dinner about how we can minimise the effort that we spend on court to get the same performance.
This is important because when it comes to the long-drawn rallies, it'll really come down to who can do the most with the least energy.
Here's a technique that I use personally to get the most out of my time on court. It involves knowing when you can walk and when you have to run to get into position.
Before I start however, you'll need to know a bit about the defensive technique of clearing and drop shots. I've written a few articles about badminton strategies so you can browse around using the labels on the right side of your page.
Once you have a pretty good idea of how you can move an opponent around with flat clears and how you can buy time for yourself with high clears, you're ready to start bringing that knowledge to the court.
Take a few games and get familiar with the kind of strokes you like to do, and generally how long it takes for the shuttle to reach the opponent's racket. Once you've got yourself a good sense of the timing involved, you're ready to start Counting Four.
The rules are simple - badminton footwork is like dancing. I take it in counts of four and eight, allowing myself three counts to get to the shuttle, and the fourth to hit.
Once you get to four, you'll need to start moving to the centre, using the first of the next series of four to get into the general direction.
On the second count of the second set, your opponent would have hit the shuttle. That's when you adjust your movement and take out the next three steps of the second set.
You adjust the speed of the count according to how fast the game is going. Use the rhythm to keep you on your toes and get to where you want to go.
Do take note that this technique is more likely to be applied when you're on the offensive or when the game is neutral. Defensive play might involve shortening the counts to three or two, until you're able to extend the counts with a good lift.
Basically, the last counts of the set are when you're hitting the shuttle. Reset the count and establish a steady beat to keep your mind and body in the game.
Happy shuttling!
This is important because when it comes to the long-drawn rallies, it'll really come down to who can do the most with the least energy.
Here's a technique that I use personally to get the most out of my time on court. It involves knowing when you can walk and when you have to run to get into position.
Before I start however, you'll need to know a bit about the defensive technique of clearing and drop shots. I've written a few articles about badminton strategies so you can browse around using the labels on the right side of your page.
Once you have a pretty good idea of how you can move an opponent around with flat clears and how you can buy time for yourself with high clears, you're ready to start bringing that knowledge to the court.
Take a few games and get familiar with the kind of strokes you like to do, and generally how long it takes for the shuttle to reach the opponent's racket. Once you've got yourself a good sense of the timing involved, you're ready to start Counting Four.
The rules are simple - badminton footwork is like dancing. I take it in counts of four and eight, allowing myself three counts to get to the shuttle, and the fourth to hit.
Once you get to four, you'll need to start moving to the centre, using the first of the next series of four to get into the general direction.
On the second count of the second set, your opponent would have hit the shuttle. That's when you adjust your movement and take out the next three steps of the second set.
You adjust the speed of the count according to how fast the game is going. Use the rhythm to keep you on your toes and get to where you want to go.
Do take note that this technique is more likely to be applied when you're on the offensive or when the game is neutral. Defensive play might involve shortening the counts to three or two, until you're able to extend the counts with a good lift.
Basically, the last counts of the set are when you're hitting the shuttle. Reset the count and establish a steady beat to keep your mind and body in the game.
Happy shuttling!
Badminton Racket First Impressions: Prince Triple Threat 2700
Prince has always produced rackets of quality, and I'm speaking from experience here. Prior to this, I've had the chance to get my hands on two other Prince badminton rackets - the OS Black and the Black Pearl XP - both of which are very well suited to the average shuttler.
But that's just it. Prince caters to serve as a very well-made racket that will fit all kinds of players. While the control and strength are excellent, I do see their rackets missing the extra push when it comes to going beyond good and into being a great piece of sport engineering.
Take the Prince Triple Threat 2700 for example. While it's performed well on all fronts in terms of control (in fact it felt great when I was taking on a slower game of singles today), there was just something missing in the hits that caused me to trade out the racket for the other one I brought.
And when I find out what that missing element is, I'll be sure to write a review for the lovely looking racket.
But that's just it. Prince caters to serve as a very well-made racket that will fit all kinds of players. While the control and strength are excellent, I do see their rackets missing the extra push when it comes to going beyond good and into being a great piece of sport engineering.
Take the Prince Triple Threat 2700 for example. While it's performed well on all fronts in terms of control (in fact it felt great when I was taking on a slower game of singles today), there was just something missing in the hits that caused me to trade out the racket for the other one I brought.
And when I find out what that missing element is, I'll be sure to write a review for the lovely looking racket.
Badminton Racket First Look: Prince Triple Threat 2700
I think I got my eye on this one since a year back, but didn't get a chance to own it coz someone bought it before me.
But surprise, surprise, the stringer found one in his store, and here I go with another purchase.
Take a look.
But surprise, surprise, the stringer found one in his store, and here I go with another purchase.
Take a look.
Selamat Hari Raya and happy holidays!
Quite a bit of the readers who chance their way to this blog are from Malaysia, and I thought I'd give a shout-out since it's the festive holidays over where they are.
Selemat Hari Raya for the Muslim readers, and happy holiday to all others!
Selemat Hari Raya for the Muslim readers, and happy holiday to all others!
Badminton Racket Review: Mizuno Tetracross 700
I love the Mizuno brand. I've filled my closets with their shirts and bags, and for the longest time, I've looked at their rackets on the websites wishing that I could get my hands on one of them. Unfortunately, there's no distributor in Singapore for the brand's rackets, and they've been elusive.
Until one day I chanced upon someone on the Badminton Central Forums wanting to let go of a mint condition Tetracross 700. I jumped, and here it is with me ever since.
My first Mizuno! But it didn't impress when I took it to the court eagerly for a test run - the clears were weak and the weight wasn't as suited for my play as my expectations.
But time went on and I changed to using the racket for my doubles games. It's been performing well so far, and I've got a review for you guys.
This review is my opinion of the racket from using it in my games, my style. There are a lot of ways to play badminton, so take this review with a pinch of salt. I'm here to tell you, in as much accuracy as I can, how my games went with the racket. Comments welcome!
Ok here goes.
Mizuno Tetracross 700
Est. Dry Weight: 85g (3U)
Grip Size: G5
Balance: Head Light
Flex: Stiff
Strings: Yonex BG66 Ultimax 66 @ 25lbs
I use this racket for doubles play.
Defense
The Mizuno Tetracross 700 is blazing fast. The isometric head shape is very slight, and that lends quite a bit to the aerodynamics of the racket. Being a head light racket also helped it achieve a very good speed on the swings. Smashes hardly trouble me with this in my hand, and the time it gives me as a result allows me to control the return pretty well.
Something that I noticed about the Tetracross 700 was how I could drive a shuttle low with speed to the other end of the back court from a smash. A flick of the wrist and it's gone to the other side, sometimes before the attacker can land or move proper.
However, high blocks are a problem. Given the lack of power from the racket, the underarm lifts from smashes too a little beating, often not strong enough to get to the back court.
But despite that I've noticed that I don't get attacked a whole lot when I'm equipped with the TC700. And if I ever were, I'm pretty confident that I can give a good defensive fight.
Attack
I received a comment on the blog that this is a wrist racket, and that the smashes from the Mizuno Tetracross700 would be amazing for someone who's able to harness the use of the wrist.
It didn't take long for me to find out how good this racket was to smash. The sound of the shuttle came off sharp and resolute, a reflection of its path to the other side of the court.
There's a loud smash, and then the shuttle is controlled to the other end, into the tightest opening. Though the largest problem for the racket so far is its inability to clear too far, the attacking prowess of the racket somewhat makes up for it.
Control
Of the three types of rackets that I have I think head light ones give me the most problem when it comes to controlling the shuttle. The Mizuno Tetracross 700 performs quite well in this aspect, allowing me to place the shuttle rather accurately and with speed, but only if it's an offensive downward stroke.
The racket seems to have a problem generating power when you're trying to clear or lift. As mentioned earlier, you'll really need your wrist to make the long clear happen.
And one thing happens when you've concentrating too much on getting the distance on the shuttle - you lose control. Having to use more than usual strength to get the longer shots will mean you can't place it as well.
This showed when a larger than usual portion of my clears failed to get beyond the first service line.
Net control is great, with the light head of the racket allowing you more flexibility and agility to pull off the trick shots.
Not too shabby, but the long clears really lost quite a bit of appeal for me.
Looks
I don't like green, especially when I know that there's an other shade of blue to the Mizuno Tetracross 700. It's not pretty, but I won't go as far as to call it hideous.
Until one day I chanced upon someone on the Badminton Central Forums wanting to let go of a mint condition Tetracross 700. I jumped, and here it is with me ever since.
My first Mizuno! But it didn't impress when I took it to the court eagerly for a test run - the clears were weak and the weight wasn't as suited for my play as my expectations.
But time went on and I changed to using the racket for my doubles games. It's been performing well so far, and I've got a review for you guys.
This review is my opinion of the racket from using it in my games, my style. There are a lot of ways to play badminton, so take this review with a pinch of salt. I'm here to tell you, in as much accuracy as I can, how my games went with the racket. Comments welcome!
Ok here goes.
Mizuno Tetracross 700
Est. Dry Weight: 85g (3U)
Grip Size: G5
Balance: Head Light
Flex: Stiff
Strings: Yonex BG66 Ultimax 66 @ 25lbs
I use this racket for doubles play.
Defense
The Mizuno Tetracross 700 is blazing fast. The isometric head shape is very slight, and that lends quite a bit to the aerodynamics of the racket. Being a head light racket also helped it achieve a very good speed on the swings. Smashes hardly trouble me with this in my hand, and the time it gives me as a result allows me to control the return pretty well.
Something that I noticed about the Tetracross 700 was how I could drive a shuttle low with speed to the other end of the back court from a smash. A flick of the wrist and it's gone to the other side, sometimes before the attacker can land or move proper.
However, high blocks are a problem. Given the lack of power from the racket, the underarm lifts from smashes too a little beating, often not strong enough to get to the back court.
But despite that I've noticed that I don't get attacked a whole lot when I'm equipped with the TC700. And if I ever were, I'm pretty confident that I can give a good defensive fight.
Attack
I received a comment on the blog that this is a wrist racket, and that the smashes from the Mizuno Tetracross700 would be amazing for someone who's able to harness the use of the wrist.
It didn't take long for me to find out how good this racket was to smash. The sound of the shuttle came off sharp and resolute, a reflection of its path to the other side of the court.
There's a loud smash, and then the shuttle is controlled to the other end, into the tightest opening. Though the largest problem for the racket so far is its inability to clear too far, the attacking prowess of the racket somewhat makes up for it.
Control
Of the three types of rackets that I have I think head light ones give me the most problem when it comes to controlling the shuttle. The Mizuno Tetracross 700 performs quite well in this aspect, allowing me to place the shuttle rather accurately and with speed, but only if it's an offensive downward stroke.
The racket seems to have a problem generating power when you're trying to clear or lift. As mentioned earlier, you'll really need your wrist to make the long clear happen.
And one thing happens when you've concentrating too much on getting the distance on the shuttle - you lose control. Having to use more than usual strength to get the longer shots will mean you can't place it as well.
This showed when a larger than usual portion of my clears failed to get beyond the first service line.
Net control is great, with the light head of the racket allowing you more flexibility and agility to pull off the trick shots.
Not too shabby, but the long clears really lost quite a bit of appeal for me.
Looks
I don't like green, especially when I know that there's an other shade of blue to the Mizuno Tetracross 700. It's not pretty, but I won't go as far as to call it hideous.
Mizuno Tetracross 700
Defense: 9
Attack: 7
Control: 8
Looks: 5
Badminton Racket Review: Li-Ning Woods N90
So it's time for the big one. The racket that Lin Dan uses. The one that produces as much haters as supporters. The Li-Ning Woods N90.
First impressions of the racket was good - the control was top notch, and the stiffness worker more for it than against it. The cautions on the web made sense - it is a punishing racket to use. But one with a decent technique will find the Li-Ning Woods N90 a very professional racket.
So how did it perform for me?
This review is my opinion of the racket from using it in my games, my style. There are a lot of ways to play badminton, so take this review with a pinch of salt. I'm here to tell you, in as much accuracy as I can, how my games went with the racket. Comments welcome!
Ok here goes.
Li-Ning Woods N90
Est. Dry Weight: 90g (3U)
Grip Size: S2 (eq. Yonex G5)
Balance: Head Heavy
Max String Tension: 28lbs
Flex: Very Stiff
Strings: Yonex Nanogy 99 @ 25lbs
I use this racket for singles play.
Defense
This racket is HEAD HEAVY. Holding it in your hand you could feel gravity just trying to pull it from you. It's no joke that players who do not have confidence with their skills should not try the Li-Ning Woods N90. There are 3 main reasons why.
I will start with the first - defense. If you're not able to successfully receive at least 7/10 smashes thrown at you and place them in a good enough position to deprive your opponent of the second attack, then this racket is not for you.
I found the N90 a tad slower than most of my head heavy rackets, and this is reasonably so. The very stiff shaft and the weight orientation is not forgiving to one who cannot defend well. Those going for power can opt for a lighter and less stiff racket that will no doubt increase your game play better than the Li-Ning Woods N90.
That being said, I've found the defense of the N90 to be rather substantial, though less than that of it's cousin the N90-II. Blocks can be decently placed to areas of the court, and the tight net drop blocks off a smash is brilliant.
Though I experienced a slower speed lifting the racket from a low position on the second smash, which means I'm more likely to suffer a loss from the follow up smash, the initial defense were pulled up well and satisfactorily.
Expect good things out of this racket when it comes to defense, but also expect the defense to be less than what you're used to.
Attack
This is a no brainer. A head heavy racket with a very stiff shaft can only mean that the attacks coming off the N90 can only be extreme.
On a smash, I could literally feel the shuttle trying to run away from the string bed, slicing through the air as it makes it way to the opposite site. As stiff as the racket is, it delivers in terms of shot power. This racket is a rocket launcher.
As always, there's a drawback to all this power. One who uses the wrist watch out. This racket is not really recommended for you. The stiffness of the racket runs down to the handle, and this in turn will pull your wrist down much more than the other attacking rackets will.
The Li-Ning Woods N90 will injure your wrist if you don't practice caution.
The extreme weight distribution of the racket is also not one to be disregarded. After a few long rallies you can feel the acid build up in your arms and making the next shot that little bit harder. By the end of the session, you'll notice a loss in shot power and distance.
The N90 can take down its user as fast as it can decimate its opponents.
Control
I caught myself walking around the court a few times today during my singles games. That's always a good sign that I'm in control and can dictate the pace of the game.
The N90 gives me a level of precision that is very much desirable. The stiffness of the racket gives your shots very little variation and thus offers you a high level of control along with overwhelming power and a semi-reliable defensive prowess.
Alternative clears, drop shots, pushes and drives were all very well-executed as I used all four corners of the court to my whim. The Li-Ning N90 accords me a level of control comparable to my even balanced rackets like the Yonex ArcSaber.
One thing I noticed though, the backhands were crazy hard to pull off well. The stiffness of the racket works against you here, requiring almost perfect technique to execute. As the racket leaves your body and your elbows and and wrist start to supinate, you will very much feel the racket bring your wrist down a few more degrees than you'd like.
And with the weight of the racket working against you when you throw a backhand, I would sincerely recommend those who cannot consistently perform back-to-back court backhand clears to try more overheads when wielding the N90.
From maintaining my defensive game to turning the pace and going offense with a well-made block, the Li-Ning N90 keeps up with the game that's going on in my mind, allowing me to ease up on trying to make the shuttle keep to its flight path and concentrate on pushing the opponent around the court and watching the magic happen.
Looks
This one's a little off. Plainly decorated with red, black and a hint of white on the head frame, the N90 speaks volumes with its simple design. The paint work is definitely unassuming to its potential.
It's like the fortune of having a good game is depicted with the primary red color, while the outcome is marred between the opposing clouds of white and black at the tip of the Li-Ning Woods N90.
First impressions of the racket was good - the control was top notch, and the stiffness worker more for it than against it. The cautions on the web made sense - it is a punishing racket to use. But one with a decent technique will find the Li-Ning Woods N90 a very professional racket.
So how did it perform for me?
This review is my opinion of the racket from using it in my games, my style. There are a lot of ways to play badminton, so take this review with a pinch of salt. I'm here to tell you, in as much accuracy as I can, how my games went with the racket. Comments welcome!
Ok here goes.
Li-Ning Woods N90
Est. Dry Weight: 90g (3U)
Grip Size: S2 (eq. Yonex G5)
Balance: Head Heavy
Max String Tension: 28lbs
Flex: Very Stiff
Strings: Yonex Nanogy 99 @ 25lbs
I use this racket for singles play.
Defense
This racket is HEAD HEAVY. Holding it in your hand you could feel gravity just trying to pull it from you. It's no joke that players who do not have confidence with their skills should not try the Li-Ning Woods N90. There are 3 main reasons why.
I will start with the first - defense. If you're not able to successfully receive at least 7/10 smashes thrown at you and place them in a good enough position to deprive your opponent of the second attack, then this racket is not for you.
I found the N90 a tad slower than most of my head heavy rackets, and this is reasonably so. The very stiff shaft and the weight orientation is not forgiving to one who cannot defend well. Those going for power can opt for a lighter and less stiff racket that will no doubt increase your game play better than the Li-Ning Woods N90.
That being said, I've found the defense of the N90 to be rather substantial, though less than that of it's cousin the N90-II. Blocks can be decently placed to areas of the court, and the tight net drop blocks off a smash is brilliant.
Though I experienced a slower speed lifting the racket from a low position on the second smash, which means I'm more likely to suffer a loss from the follow up smash, the initial defense were pulled up well and satisfactorily.
Expect good things out of this racket when it comes to defense, but also expect the defense to be less than what you're used to.
Attack
This is a no brainer. A head heavy racket with a very stiff shaft can only mean that the attacks coming off the N90 can only be extreme.
On a smash, I could literally feel the shuttle trying to run away from the string bed, slicing through the air as it makes it way to the opposite site. As stiff as the racket is, it delivers in terms of shot power. This racket is a rocket launcher.
As always, there's a drawback to all this power. One who uses the wrist watch out. This racket is not really recommended for you. The stiffness of the racket runs down to the handle, and this in turn will pull your wrist down much more than the other attacking rackets will.
The Li-Ning Woods N90 will injure your wrist if you don't practice caution.
The extreme weight distribution of the racket is also not one to be disregarded. After a few long rallies you can feel the acid build up in your arms and making the next shot that little bit harder. By the end of the session, you'll notice a loss in shot power and distance.
The N90 can take down its user as fast as it can decimate its opponents.
Control
I caught myself walking around the court a few times today during my singles games. That's always a good sign that I'm in control and can dictate the pace of the game.
The N90 gives me a level of precision that is very much desirable. The stiffness of the racket gives your shots very little variation and thus offers you a high level of control along with overwhelming power and a semi-reliable defensive prowess.
Alternative clears, drop shots, pushes and drives were all very well-executed as I used all four corners of the court to my whim. The Li-Ning N90 accords me a level of control comparable to my even balanced rackets like the Yonex ArcSaber.
One thing I noticed though, the backhands were crazy hard to pull off well. The stiffness of the racket works against you here, requiring almost perfect technique to execute. As the racket leaves your body and your elbows and and wrist start to supinate, you will very much feel the racket bring your wrist down a few more degrees than you'd like.
And with the weight of the racket working against you when you throw a backhand, I would sincerely recommend those who cannot consistently perform back-to-back court backhand clears to try more overheads when wielding the N90.
From maintaining my defensive game to turning the pace and going offense with a well-made block, the Li-Ning N90 keeps up with the game that's going on in my mind, allowing me to ease up on trying to make the shuttle keep to its flight path and concentrate on pushing the opponent around the court and watching the magic happen.
Looks
This one's a little off. Plainly decorated with red, black and a hint of white on the head frame, the N90 speaks volumes with its simple design. The paint work is definitely unassuming to its potential.
It's like the fortune of having a good game is depicted with the primary red color, while the outcome is marred between the opposing clouds of white and black at the tip of the Li-Ning Woods N90.
Li-Ning Woods N90
Defense: 8
Attack: 10
Control: 9
Looks: 7
Badminton Racket First Impressions: Li-Ning N90
I've heard warnings from reviews and comments on the blog that this racket was hard to tame. It's as stiff as they come, and the head's just really heavy.
I've had experiences with overly head-heavy rackets before, and those didn't turn out well. Maybe that's why I've been staying away from the N90 for so long. That, and because the color scheme just really isn't that exciting.
So Lin Dan won the Olympics, and I thought I'd celebrate with a small racket purchase :)
And off to the courts we went this morning with the new racket in hand, ready with the restraints on the wrist hoping that the weight won't break it when I smash.
But it turned out to be a really good experience!
The Li-Ning N90 somehow managed to turn the really stiff shaft into a reasonably agile one. I was able to twist and turn the racket around to cope with defending and placement.
That trait caught me off guard as I was expecting a very hard time taming the racket.
Attacks were strong right off the bat, even the slight check smash could yield a respectable speed. Not once did the stiffness of the shaft affect the quality of my attack.
Until we got to the backhand!
One would really need a good technique to carry a good backhand from the Li-Ning N90. If you know what a panhandle grip is, you'd want to use that with a proper supination technique and adjust the angle. That will give you a better grip on the racket as the very stiff shaft will tend to wander off your palm on backhands.
Short from the minor setback of the backhand, the N90 performs superbly. I will provide a review soon.
I've had experiences with overly head-heavy rackets before, and those didn't turn out well. Maybe that's why I've been staying away from the N90 for so long. That, and because the color scheme just really isn't that exciting.
So Lin Dan won the Olympics, and I thought I'd celebrate with a small racket purchase :)
And off to the courts we went this morning with the new racket in hand, ready with the restraints on the wrist hoping that the weight won't break it when I smash.
But it turned out to be a really good experience!
The Li-Ning N90 somehow managed to turn the really stiff shaft into a reasonably agile one. I was able to twist and turn the racket around to cope with defending and placement.
That trait caught me off guard as I was expecting a very hard time taming the racket.
Attacks were strong right off the bat, even the slight check smash could yield a respectable speed. Not once did the stiffness of the shaft affect the quality of my attack.
Until we got to the backhand!
One would really need a good technique to carry a good backhand from the Li-Ning N90. If you know what a panhandle grip is, you'd want to use that with a proper supination technique and adjust the angle. That will give you a better grip on the racket as the very stiff shaft will tend to wander off your palm on backhands.
Short from the minor setback of the backhand, the N90 performs superbly. I will provide a review soon.
